| |
Clinical response of human subjects to rear-end automobile collisions [published
erratum appears in Arch Phys Med Rehabil
TITLE:
|
Clinical response of human subjects
to rear-end automobile collisions [published erratum appears in Arch Phys
Med Rehabil 1998 Jun;79(6):723] [see comments] |
AUTHORS:
|
Brault JR; Wheeler JB; Siegmund
GP; Brault EJ |
AUTHOR AFFILIATION:
|
Biomechanics Research & Consulting,
Inc., El Segundo, CA 90245, USA. |
SOURCE:
|
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998 Jan;79(1):72-80
|
CITATION IDS:
|
PMID: 9440422 UI: 98103605
|
COMMENT:
|
Comment in: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
1998 Jun;79(6):721; discussion 722-3
Comment in: Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998 Jun;79(6):721-3
Comment in: Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998 Aug;79(8):1024-5 |
ABSTRACT:
|
OBJECTIVE: Forty-two persons were
exposed to controlled low-speed rear-end automobile collisions to assess
the relation between both gender and impact severity and the presence, severity,
and duration of whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). Individual measures
were also assessed for their potential to predict the onset of WAD. DESIGN:
Experimental study subjecting individuals to a speed change of 4 km/h and
8 km/h and utilizing pretest and posttest physical examinations (immediately
after and 24 hours after impact) to quantify subjects' clinical response.
RESULTS: Approximately 29% and 38% of the subjects exposed to the 4 km/h
and 8 km/h speed changes, respectively, experienced WAD symptoms, with cervical
symptoms and headaches predominating. Objective clinical deficits consistent
with WAD were measured in both men and women subjects at both 4 km/h and
8 km/h. At 4 km/h, the duration of symptoms experienced by women was significantly
longer when compared with that in men (p < .05). There were no significant
differences in the presence and severity of WAD between men and women at
4 km/h and 8 km/h or in the duration of WAD at 8 km/h. There was also no
significant difference in the presence, severity, and duration of WAD between
4 km/h and 8 km/h. No preimpact measures were predictive of WAD. CONCLUSION:
The empirical findings in this study contribute to establishing a causal
relationship between rear-end collisions and clinical signs and symptoms.
|
MAIN MESH HEADINGS:
|
*Accidents, Traffic
*Injury Severity Score
*Sex Characteristics
Whiplash Injuries/*etiology |
| | |